A provincial road-safety authority needed a complete vehicle testing system where none existed: standards, laboratory, and procedures built on UNECE WP.29, the same international rulebook used in the UK and Australia to approve vehicles.
A provincial road-safety authority, responsible for the vehicles driven by a province of more than 110 million people, had no complete testing laboratory and no single written rulebook to test vehicles against. Safety decisions rested on inspection practice, not on measured proof.
The authority needed both halves of the system: the standards that define what a safe vehicle is, and the laboratory that can prove it. We designed the two together, because either one without the other is paperwork.
The design was anchored to UNECE WP.29, the international framework used in the UK, Australia, and more than 50 countries to approve vehicles. Every test category, equipment requirement, and procedure was mapped to it.
The result: a complete, buildable system. Written standards, a laboratory design with equipment and layout, and the documentation structures the authority needs to run both, all in a regulatory language the rest of the world already speaks.
The authority was responsible for vehicle safety across a province of more than 110 million people, but the standards it could enforce were incomplete, and there was no laboratory to test vehicles against them.
Writing standards without a lab produces paperwork. Building a lab without standards produces an expensive building. Both had to be designed as one system.
We started from UNECE WP.29, the international framework behind vehicle approval in most of the world, and mapped it to the province's real fleet and conditions.
Test categories, equipment requirements, procedures, and documentation structures were drafted and checked against the framework line by line: written for local roads, in international language.
The authority received a complete standards set and a laboratory blueprint it can build against, from test lanes and equipment down to record-keeping.
And because the system speaks WP.29, a vehicle tested under it can be discussed in the same regulatory language used in the UK, Australia, and most of the world.
The same five stages we run on every engagement, applied here. Hover or tap a stage to see what it covered.
Every item below was written to be used by the engineers who will run the laboratory and the officials who will enforce against it, not to sit in a file.
What this engagement put in place, and the evidence base behind the team that delivered it.
Tell us the decision you face. A senior engineer will review it and reply within two business days. If we are not the right firm for it, we will say so.
Every inquiry is reviewed by a senior engineer. Response within 2 business days.
