What was going wrong
Drone engine development relied on physical prototyping. Each iteration meant machining parts, assembling engines, and running tests. When performance fell short, teams could not tell if the problem was aerodynamic, thermal, or mechanical.
There was no reliable way to predict power output or fuel consumption at altitude before metal was cut. Decisions were made with guesswork, and guesswork is expensive at high RPM.
How we built it
We built a computational model of the Rotax engine using actual cylinder geometry, valve timing, and fuel injection parameters. The simulation ran combustion cycles, airflow patterns, and heat transfer calculations across the operating envelope.
Every result was checked against published engine data and independent test reports. Where the model diverged from reality, we traced the cause and refined the assumptions.
Where it landed
The research produced a validated simulation framework that predicts engine power, fuel consumption, and thermal load across altitude and speed ranges relevant to drone operation.
The work was published in peer-reviewed journals and forms part of the engineering foundation behind Freedom Masons approach to engine testing and performance analysis.