What was going wrong
The project arrived with three drawing sets in circulation and no agreed revision. Two subcontractors were building to superseded plans, and nobody could say who had approved the last four variations.
Costs were moving faster than the paperwork. The owner was being asked to sign off amounts he had no written basis to check.
How we ran it
We froze the scope in writing, rebuilt the drawing register from scratch, and issued a single controlled set with revision numbers on every sheet.
Every variation then went through one route: raised, priced, reviewed, approved, and only then released to site. Nothing got built on a verbal instruction.
Where it landed
Thirty-eight change orders were raised across the programme. All thirty-eight were priced and signed before work started, and none went to dispute.
The tenants kept trading throughout. The owner ended with a handover file that made the next building easier to price.